X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:29:51 +0100 From: Robin Walker Reply-To: Robin Walker To: "Hochstedler, Ben (GE Healthcare)" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: fork failure patch for cygrunsrv Message-ID: <127543258B0B9054522CC18C@qjunbur.quns.cam.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <93BD0000E4D72D458F0E8CDE6BA971A833D8BE@CINMLVEM11.e2k.ad.ge.com> References: <93BD0000E4D72D458F0E8CDE6BA971A833D8BE AT CINMLVEM11 DOT e2k DOT ad DOT ge DOT com > X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.4 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --On 16 June 2006 16:49 -0400 "Hochstedler, Ben (GE Healthcare)" wrote: > fork() can fail when the system runs out of non-interactive heap space > (because there's not enough heap memory to allocate to the launched > process). If we, as end-users, suffer from fork() failing for the above reason, which parameter should be adjusted so that there is enough heap memory available for fork() not to fail like this? -- Robin Walker (Junior Bursar), Queens' College, Cambridge CB3 9ET, UK rdhw AT cam DOT ac DOT uk http://www.queens.cam.ac.uk/ Tel:+44 1223 335528 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/