X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <448AB51E.1070809@pacific.net.sg>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:03:42 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare AT pacific DOT net DOT sg>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Why is Cygwin1.dll monolithic?
References: <448A9EB0 DOT 4050404 AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz>
In-Reply-To: <448A9EB0.4050404@sh.cvut.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id k5AC4O7d016250

Hi,

Václav Haisman wrote:
> Today I woke up and one of the first things that came on my mind was
> this: Why isn't Cygwin1.dll devided to the "kernel" and separate C library?

isn't it just the API?

So why should there be a 'kernel'?

Erich


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/