X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <448A9EB0.4050404@sh.cvut.cz> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:28:00 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBIYWlzbWFu?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Why is Cygwin1.dll monolithic? OpenPGP: id=733031B4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7409F3A8DD2BAD5678AB7B44" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --------------enig7409F3A8DD2BAD5678AB7B44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Today I woke up and one of the first things that came on my mind was this: Why isn't Cygwin1.dll devided to the "kernel" and separate C library? -- Vaclav Haisman PS: I am not trying to suggest anything or to troll, I am merely curious. --------------enig7409F3A8DD2BAD5678AB7B44 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEVAwUBRIqetm56zbtzMDG0AQJQXwgAohJC3B1Q/8YTmoZ9pVEVALuZEeqBZQgd 3tMwg00HsIpyVxFX90O/vzNqemeKDJZfafEsZ9oidLpglXXfwKc9+hOmTjdIkMVq ClR2NVHfeLUopkGOLZ+Tn9addSTonA5U3VDEbtAJJ5L6F5h4dPEjtcoyS9DjZOZE x7o6A7GceMSIVIbFoXfzQGDwiDFypXk6p/BVxO6hbbD8pU7TARqVFjhLsGShJIcE tcfx5JrObCbzBfOSayDBOKfv+gTDpoJxR2LmThDmSS1SGDg72e2SXiIfYtH1gGFF jYAqsncsgzVdyrwQViftAEtXtSZfGqjjULuJ6yIzeQUdVGugneeRzg== =7Qjz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7409F3A8DD2BAD5678AB7B44--