X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:42:35 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 20060529: python and semaphores
Message-ID: <20060531154235.GD23466@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <447CFD10 DOT 3030404 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20060531025857 DOT GA20999 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <447D44D7 DOT 5020507 AT freenet DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <447D44D7.5020507@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:25:11AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>Christopher Faylor schrieb:
>> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:18:56PM -0500, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
><snip>
>> Unless I'm missing something, the backtrace is useless and probably doesn't
>> show a real problem.  It is just YA example of the "OMG! I get SIGSEGV's in
>> GDB!!!!" problem which we must discuss every day here.
>
>One more reason to have an updated gdb binary package. Is nobody there
>who can make a gdb binary package instead that everyone has to compile
>it by himself ? Making a package is not very much work, giving support
>more. As starting point I've made a binary snapshot located on
>http://webdev.cegit.de/snapshots/cygwin/

Gee.  I wonder if there's some reason why there isn't already a gdb binary
package.

I guess it is usually safe to assume WJM but in this case it isn't the
case.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/