X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <447D44D7.5020507@freenet.de>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:25:11 +0200
From: Ralf Habacker <ralf DOT habacker AT freenet DOT de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 20060529: python and semaphores
References: <447CFD10 DOT 3030404 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20060531025857 DOT GA20999 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20060531025857.GA20999@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor schrieb:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:18:56PM -0500, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
<snip>
> Unless I'm missing something, the backtrace is useless and probably doesn't
> show a real problem.  It is just YA example of the "OMG! I get SIGSEGV's in
> GDB!!!!" problem which we must discuss every day here.

One more reason to have an updated gdb binary package. Is nobody there
who can make a gdb binary package instead that everyone has to compile
it by himself ? Making a package is not very much work, giving support
more. As starting point I've made a binary snapshot located on
http://webdev.cegit.de/snapshots/cygwin/

Regards
 Ralf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/