X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: X-Sender: vilarneto AT hotmail DOT com In-Reply-To: From: "Vilar Camara" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sshd+ssh localhost connects, but don't reach the shell Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 11:51:27 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hello again, > > Well, things get more and more confusing. That's what I did: > > > > - Removed c:\cygwin from PATH; > > - Uninstalled cygwin services (actually only sshd); > > - Installed a fresh, new cygwin instance under J:\cygwin (a NTFS > > partition). Accepted default package set, only added openssh and > > dependences; > > - Rebooted, ssh-host-config -y; > > - ssh localhost. > > > > Still no success! > >Need more detail, and completeness (you don't say if you started the >service and >how). I'm sorry, I've changed the event order: the correct is "- ssh-host-config -y, rebooted;". I mean, the service was auto-started during boot, as configured by the script. >Can you "ping localhost"? No problem with that (response time <1ms). It resolves "localhost" as 127.0.0.1. > > Now I'm completely clueless. Since this happens in two very distinct > > machines (my desktop and my notebook), I don't think it is > > hardware-related. > >Who said it was hardware related? Oh, nobody, I'm just considering all possibilities. This one is (was?) in the "unplausible" list. :-) >We don't know if FAT32 is a factor. From your testing it appears that it >is not. Yes; and, as happened to you, it would complain if it doesn't like permission settings. >Turn you attention to the network part. > >The symptoms do appear like a firewall issue like Larry Hall said, This is always a point to be rechecked. I just did it: - All ssh.exe, ssh2.exe (Windows GUI client) and sshd.exe have full permissions set to access and server; - Logging on, but no log entries about these programs being blocked. Anyway, as I said before, all my tests were performed with firewall not running. Should I try, for the sake of completeness, uninstalling it? >also could be >a hijacked /etc/hosts, check it (hijacked by spyware that is redirecting >network >traffic to their own spy server -- never seen an actual case but it comes >to >mind after seeing similar redirections on a friend's computer). Nothing there. "localhost" is the only entry in /etc/hosts (which is a link to Windows config file in C:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts). Windows' lmhosts.sam is clean. >If ping works, try "telnet 127.0.0.1 22" (use the numeric IP address) you >should >see "SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.3", then type anything and you'll get "Protocol >mismatch." and the connection is closed. Good point. I ran it, but got no response at all (telnet screen remains blank). Also (just to check) it doesn't work if service is down. So, everything is pointing towards a failure in the server side. >If those two work... we'll see (I would break out the protocol analyzer but >that >may be too much). I was exactly thinking about using Ethereal. However, I can't go much far on that, since I don't know nothing about the protocol. I'l see what Ethereal has to tell me. Again, thank you for all the help. -- Best regards, Vilar Camara Neto -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/