X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:15:06 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: stdio.h Message-ID: <20060529151506.GA12157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <195b3f1f0605252214g14e70df1v9a40c38fd7e74b1f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4476DBFC DOT EB5AA4E AT dessent DOT net> <20060526155523 DOT GD2168 AT scripps DOT edu> <20060526162426 DOT GB7151 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <195b3f1f0605290104t22873820g2fd8830d4284e0ae AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <195b3f1f0605290104t22873820g2fd8830d4284e0ae@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 05:04:02PM +0900, Wynfield Henman wrote: >1.) Any idea of when a release of cygwin will be made of the "current >versions" contiaining the > _GNU_SOURCE to avoid collision with old-style declarations? Look at the mailing list archives and see all of the messages asking people to test snapshots. You can draw your own conclusions from these messages. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/