X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 10:48:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Peshansky Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: ask cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: flex? In-Reply-To: <20060528023123.132661a94e08ba2a4a13e304d833fafe.614acc611d.wbe@email.secureserver.net> Message-ID: References: <20060528023123 DOT 132661a94e08ba2a4a13e304d833fafe DOT 614acc611d DOT wbe AT email DOT secureserver DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sun, 28 May 2006, ask wrote: > thing is i don't know what's wrong :) And neither do we, since you've completely failed to quote the relevant context AND your mailer didn't include threading information in the message. So the above message is essentially out of the blue for most people. With a bit of detective work, one can trace it down to , which told you, in no uncertain terms, that you need to link to libfl (using the -lfl flag) when you use flex, and you don't. flex itself did not fail for you -- it simply produced some symbols that are in libfl. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu | igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!) |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte." "But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac" -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/