X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: stdio.h Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:12:38 +0100 Message-ID: <005b01c680ac$eac1d6a0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <195b3f1f0605252214g14e70df1v9a40c38fd7e74b1f@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 26 May 2006 06:14, Wynfield Henman wrote: > I have run into problems with getline being defined in stdio.h That's a really imprecise description of the situation. Could mean anything. > I understand that a GNU system has it defined there but not any other > system. > > Please look into where "getline" should be defined in stdio.h or not. Cygwin counts as a GNU system, since it tries it's hardest to be like linux. Your problem is not really that getline is defined in stdio.h; your problem is that you are making hardcoded assumptions when you should be using autoconf (or similar) tests. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/