X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <44741FC8.509@freenet.de> Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:56:40 +0200 From: Ralf Habacker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.19: changes have broken Qt3 References: <044e01c67e8f$0abed720$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <447350C4 DOT 1080604 AT freenet DOT de> <20060523182326 DOT GB6138 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4473607C DOT 2070806 AT freenet DOT de> <20060523200938 DOT GA8384 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20060523200938.GA8384@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Faylor schrieb: > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:20:28PM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote: >> your right, hope the above mentioned stuff help for this. > > Ralf, > You have the test case. You have the source code. You've already > provided a patch. What's stopping you from determinging the cause of > the problem now that you understand that this situation is already > supposed to be handled? I appreciate that you have tracked this down > but I don't understand why you now seem to have given up at this point. Have I said this ? I only reported about the current state in the hope someone where bitten by the same issue and had some additional hints, which seems not the case. Anyway, the problem is that in extern "C" int pthread_mutexattr_init (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr) { if (pthread_mutexattr::is_good_object (attr)) return EBUSY; *attr = new pthread_mutexattr (); pthread_mutexattr::is_good_object() is called, but attr does not contain a valid object (it is created later) and the functions aborts, which should not be. Is there a replacement for the gone check_valid_pointer() function, which could be added to pthread_mutexattr_init and was used before the call to pthread_mutexattr::is_good_object() was introduced (http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00204.html) ? BTW: A similar problem is with pthread_condattr_init () pthread_rwlockattr_init () pthread_attr_init () Regards Ralf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEdB/IoHh+5t8EXncRAsD/AJ9n/X9jLNaq0qoU2nFmpJpFLkks9QCeMJDM a16WqHXFx0EjPu7HA+ORhKI= =gRfG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/