X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: Obfuscation fails. Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:58:59 +0100 Message-ID: <042401c67e71$0aa186c0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20060523134519.AD09B58001F@pollux.warande.net> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 23 May 2006 14:44, Arend-Jan Westhoff wrote: > In the last 8 hours I have received 4 spam e-mails on the forwarding > address I use exclusively for this list. > (Have never received any spam on it before.) > > This might suggest the level of obfuscation for e-mail addresses displayed > on this list needs to be upgraded. There isn't any obfuscation if someone forgets to PCYMTNQREAIYR. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-03/msg00258.html http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00525.html Nor is there any generic way for the mailing list to know if your mailer adds custom X- headers with your email address in plain: http://www.cygwin.com/cgi-bin/get-raw-msg?listname=cygwin&date=2005-03&msgid=1 110016059.JPMCYAFVMHSL%40spammotel.com (although you could argue that X-Sender is commonplace enough that it should be added to the list of mungeable headers). > My current Cygwin e-mail address will self destruct within 5 minutes from > sending this e-mail. Well, I wasn't going to Cc you anyway :) cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/