X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: Read-only samba directory appears writable to Cygwin Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 13:33:43 -0500 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20060522165542 DOT GA21403 AT lucent DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) In-Reply-To: <20060522165542.GA21403@lucent.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Peter Fales wrote: > We've got a directory which is mounted from a Samba server. The server > is sharing the directory as read-only. However under Cygwin > > access("/path/to/samba/mount/some_file",W_OK) > > is returning 0, indicating the that file is writable. I assume this > is because Cygwin doesn't "know" that directory is read-only. Is there > any workaround (such as an option to "mount") that would tell cygwin > that the directory is read-only, or that all directories have 555 permission > instead of 755? Hmm, if you were asking this of Linux, I'd say 'use a umask option in the mount'... does Cygwin not have such a thing? (NOTE: That question is directed at the other Cygwin folks; I looked and did not find one in the 'man' so I'm guessing it does not?) -- Matthew All of my signatures are 100% original. Including this one. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/