X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: Cygwin and Emacs: How to exit? Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:28:04 -0700 Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <92010c400605091851k72a22a7bqd88037ee23ebf28a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <87d5emd0it DOT fsf AT offby1 DOT atm01 DOT sea DOT blarg DOT net> <92010c400605100433r47379b51j6c767836342d9db0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1d3a88250605100529u6850a69by57a3876829328f31 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1d3a88250605160220o7cc02bb3ud0f58dab5e9239e0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) In-Reply-To: <1d3a88250605160220o7cc02bb3ud0f58dab5e9239e0@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Lloeki wrote: >> How is this better than simply using rxvt? > I used rxvt for some time but puttycyg rolls better for me. > - I remember accented chars (french) often got messed up and that was > a pain to fix. > - I never manager to make rxvt display special chars correctly (mc and > others look like crap without them) and even if i did, that meant > giving up accented chars, as rxvt supplied fonts are ASCII 127 chars, > not Ext ASCII 255 chars. > - Switching rxvt fonts under native windows gives weird spacing. Any > font I found (incl. by STFW) that would supposedly work was either > english-only 127 characters, not mapping accented chars correctly, > not mapping special chars correctly, or both. > => everything works OOTB with puttycyg. There were other things here > and there that were finally turning me away of rxvt. > > Note that it's _only_ valid on _native_ windows, not X11 (which I > don't use, so I didn't test), where it wouldn't have much meaning to > compare them. There might just be ways to fix things under X but as I > was not interested in running it, I skipped researching it. > > There's but one thing I regret from rxvt in puttycyg: if a process > forks in the background, and I exit the login shell, rxvt closes its > window and the process continues to run, while puttycyg will keep the > window opened until the process goes down (kill or whatever through > another console). it seemed to behave the same with cmd console. > Sometimes it's "useful" when you forgot to kill that lighttpd you ran > just for testing, sometimes not, when you spawn another console ($ > putty &) and you want to close only the former. Especially, closing > the former the hard way will close the latter too. > > Just to be clear : I'm not saying puttycyg is better, I'm just saying > it fits my needs. Well I have no need for accented characters but if I hear you correctly you're also saying that other characters such as line drawing characters work better with puttycyg. That'd be one reason to go to it. However I occasionally run X and really would not like puttycyg's behavior WRT backgrounded processes. Thanks for the explanation though. -- As she lay there dozing next to me, one voice inside my head kept saying, "Relax... you are not the first doctor to sleep with one of his patients," but another kept reminding me, "Howard, you are a veterinarian." - Roger Matthews -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/