X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Berber?= Subject: Re: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5 Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:12:32 -0500 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <054c01c668a4$554924e0$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <444E95C0 DOT 9080708 AT t-online DOT de> <20060426080858 DOT GA14738 AT sellafield DOT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <1FYg6G-0BFM1o0 AT fwd31 DOT aul DOT t-online DOT de> <20060426100903 DOT GR28583 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <446A20BF DOT 5080005 AT t-online DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) In-Reply-To: <446A20BF.5080005@t-online.de> OpenPGP: url=hkp://random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christian Franke wrote: > bug-patch is not listed at http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/. > Sending the report direct to bug-patch AT gnu DOT org, I've seen no > observable difference to /dev/null ;-) >=20 > Is there a more appropriate place to report patch bugs? No, that address is the one listed (even if patch now is part of diffutils)= , see: http://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/manual/html_node/Bugs.html#Bugs --=20 Ren=E9 Berber -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/