X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <1d3a88250605160220o7cc02bb3ud0f58dab5e9239e0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:20:52 +0200 From: Lloeki To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin and Emacs: How to exit? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline References: <92010c400605091851k72a22a7bqd88037ee23ebf28a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <87d5emd0it DOT fsf AT offby1 DOT atm01 DOT sea DOT blarg DOT net> <92010c400605100433r47379b51j6c767836342d9db0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1d3a88250605100529u6850a69by57a3876829328f31 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id k4G9L55c015005 > How is this better than simply using rxvt?I used rxvt for some time but puttycyg rolls better for me.- I remember accented chars (french) often got messed up and that wasa pain to fix.- I never manager to make rxvt display special chars correctly (mc andothers look like crap without them) and even if i did, that meantgiving up accented chars, as rxvt supplied fonts are ASCII 127 chars,not Ext ASCII 255 chars.- Switching rxvt fonts under native windows gives weird spacing. Anyfont I found (incl. by STFW) that would supposedly work was eitherenglish-only 127 characters, not mapping accented chars correctly,not mapping special chars correctly, or both.=> everything works OOTB with puttycyg. There were other things hereand there that were finally turning me away of rxvt. Note that it's _only_ valid on _native_ windows, not X11 (which Idon't use, so I didn't test), where it wouldn't have much meaning tocompare them. There might just be ways to fix things under X but as Iwas not interested in running it, I skipped researching it. There's but one thing I regret from rxvt in puttycyg: if a processforks in the background, and I exit the login shell, rxvt closes itswindow and the process continues to run, while puttycyg will keep thewindow opened until the process goes down (kill or whatever throughanother console). it seemed to behave the same with cmd console.Sometimes it's "useful" when you forgot to kill that lighttpd you ranjust for testing, sometimes not, when you spawn another console ($putty &) and you want to close only the former. Especially, closingthe former the hard way will close the latter too. Just to be clear : I'm not saying puttycyg is better, I'm just sayingit fits my needs.