Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:11:34 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: need help with cygwin snapshot debugging
Message-ID: <20060516031134.GB13736@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20060510180135 DOT GA8125 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <e4b89e$1l2$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e4b89e$1l2$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:03:32PM -0700, Bryan D. Thomas wrote:
>> 1) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00718.html
>> I would appreciate knowing if anyone can duplicate 1) above
>
>I could not duplicate this issue with the snapshot binaries 2006-03-13 
>through 2006-04-27, inclusive.
>
>I installed the weather script testcase from the OP as a cron job and
>observed three runs using v5.19 where data was pulled down
>successfully.  I stopped the cron service and replaced cygwin1.dll with
>each snapshot binary, started cron, then observed three more successful
>download runs with no orphaned processes.

Thank you for testing this.  This is the kind of feedback I was hoping
for.  If you are willing to continue testing, it may be worthwhile to
keep this running for a couple of days.  Maybe it is sporadic enough
that it is only triggered very occasionally.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/