Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 19:35:26 -0700
From: clayne AT anodized DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: need help with cygwin snapshot debugging
Message-ID: <20060515023526.GN1783@ns1.anodized.com>
References: <20060510180135 DOT GA8125 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20060515010627 DOT GJ1783 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com> <20060515022329 DOT GA8550 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060515022329.GA8550@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> Hmm.  I don't see any reason for you to have included my message,
> ignored it, and then used this thread to 1) reiterate observations you
> made in another message and/or 2) discuss something unrelated to my
> request.
> 
> cgf

I don't see any reason for your rude reply to me. Read your own message:

"In general, I'd appreciate any *substantive* effort to track down
snapshot problems.

Since the previous "call for testing" thread seems to have gotten
bogged down a little, please post any snapshot-related observations
here."

Which I did, so get off my ass.

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/