X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 20:14:26 +0200 From: Peter Ekberg To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: automake: 1.4, 1.5, and wrapper Message-ID: <20060514181426.GB2422@sellafield.lysator.liu.se> References: <44651178 DOT 507 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <44651F0A DOT 20103 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44651F0A.20103@cwilson.fastmail.fm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 07:49:30PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: ... > >3) In addition, it is possible to have a wrapper for automake with our > >setup. Gentoo has a similar setup, and uses this: > > > >http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/sys-devel/automake-wrapper/files/am-wrapper-1.sh?content-type=text%2Fplain ... > #3 cui bono? The only advantage of a wrapper system, as opposed to the > status quo, is that you don't need to set the current alternative > manually to match the desired version, when using autoreconf or a > bootstrap/autogen.sh script. When using enable-maintainer-rules, even > under the current system you don't need to worry because the proper > version of automake is called explicitly. > > But wrappers are sometimes wrong, so you need to manually set > WANT_AM_FOO. When you get right down to it, what's the diff between > that and update-alternatives? Perhaps a silly question, but maybe one of the alternatives could be a wrapper? Best of both worlds, no? /p -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/