X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <1787.213.78.190.153.1146405547.squirrel@sws2.ncl.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:59:07 +0100 (BST) Subject: Source for MinGW stuff in Cygwin From: "J.D McLaughlin" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass (cheviot4.ncl.ac.uk: 128.240.233.215 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) X-Newcastle-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Postmaster AT newcastle DOT ac DOT uk for more information X-Newcastle-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Newcastle-MailScanner-MCPCheck: MCP-Clean, MCP-Checker (score=0, required 1) X-Newcastle-MailScanner-From: n1023262 AT swsimap DOT ncl DOT ac DOT uk X-NCL-Spam-Status: No Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com A while ago, while trying to find out how to write a getch function, I was told that the source for some part of Cygwin's MinGW stuff - either gcc-mingw-core/g++ or mingw-runtime - contained the source for one. After a while of searching the source for all three, I found: 1.) There was no source for getch(). 2.) The folders (and compressed folders containing my attempts to fix the problem by installing later versions of the source) containing the source for gcc-mingw-core and gcc-mingw-g++ contained no source code at all, although they contained a few other items, such as header files and (surprisingly) executable files. Is this because the wrong files have been distributed, or is there some fact I'm not aware of re: getting at the source files? Thanks for any help, James McLaughlin. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/