X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.0.20060428175532.05696608@surrey.ac.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:04:03 +0100 To: "Dave Korn" From: Lloyd Wood Subject: RE: Geomview & Cygwin setup Cc: In-Reply-To: <000401c66ae3$0d4c6a30$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> References: <7 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 20060428165427 DOT 059e7e88 AT surrey DOT ac DOT uk> <000401c66ae3$0d4c6a30$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com At Friday 2006-04-28 17:44 +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >On 28 April 2006 17:07, Lloyd Wood wrote: > > > At Friday 2006-04-28 11:45 -0400, Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\) wrote: > >> If you need to find out what gcc is targeting, perhaps you should use > >> "-dumpmachine" instead. > >> > >> $ gcc -dumpmachine > >> i686-pc-cygwin > >> $ gcc -dumpmachine -mno-cygwin > >> i686-pc-mingw32 > > > > Having identification behaviour dependent on a cygwin-specific flag > > like this is.. insane. > > When you use -mno-cygwin, you are invoking A DIFFERENT > compiler. Having the >*same* identification for two different compilers that target different >targets would be insane. But gee, that's exactly what gcc -v provides. A single identification for both compilers. Why isn't there a gcc -v -mno-cygwin, then? It's all positively minging. (Chris: note the usage tip. First g pronounced as j, so it's unlike any Chinese dynasties or Flash Gordon's nemesis.) L. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/