X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: "'Lloyd Wood'" Cc: Subject: RE: Geomview & Cygwin setup Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:44:43 +0100 Message-ID: <000401c66ae3$0d4c6a30$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.0.20060428165427.059e7e88@surrey.ac.uk> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 28 April 2006 17:07, Lloyd Wood wrote: > At Friday 2006-04-28 11:45 -0400, Williams, Gerald S \(Jerry\) wrote: >> If you need to find out what gcc is targeting, perhaps you should use >> "-dumpmachine" instead. >> >> $ gcc -dumpmachine >> i686-pc-cygwin >> $ gcc -dumpmachine -mno-cygwin >> i686-pc-mingw32 > > Having identification behaviour dependent on a cygwin-specific flag > like this is.. insane. When you use -mno-cygwin, you are invoking A DIFFERENT compiler. Having the *same* identification for two different compilers that target different targets would be insane. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/