X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-KENId: 0000214BKEN03A2D1FA X-KENRelayed: 0000214BKEN03A2D1FA AT VIVALDI Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:04:50 +0200 From: Peter Keitler Subject: Re: rsync over ssh hang issue understood To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <445107C2.5050809@baltech.de> In-Reply-To: <20060427165032.GA28583@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <061e01c6694d$18d79e20$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <014001c66953$3eeded20$b5db87d4 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <01cc01c66968$50acb950$b5db87d4 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <20060427081642 DOT GA11497 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <44508D05 DOT 307 AT baltech DOT de> <20060427165032 DOT GA28583 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-KENRecTime: 1146161090 X-AntiVir4Ken: checked by AntiVir for KEN!; host=VIVALDI ANTIVIR.VDF 6.34.01.17, AVEWIN32.DLL 6.34.01.58, AVPACK32.DLL 6.33.00.06, AVDOWNLD.DLL 6.34.00.02, UNRAR.DLL 0.00.00.00, UNACEV2.DLL 2.6.00.00, SAVAPI.DLL 6.33.00.00, SAVAKEN.DLL 6.33.00.04 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) X-Relayed-By: GPGrelay Version 0.959 (Win32) X-Spam: [F=0.0100000000; heur=0.500(-19800); stat=0.010; spamtraq-heur=0.500(2006042606)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [213.198.17.110] X-Loop-Detect: 1 X-DistLoop-Detect: 1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > On Apr 27 11:21, Peter Keitler wrote: > >>> The "rsync hangs" problem is not actually a new one. We had >>> these reports already ages ago. However, *nobody* so far having that >>> problem seem to be willing to actually debug this problem and track it >>> down. Grrr. >>> >> Corinna, >> >> maybe, the amount of files has to be increased in order to provoke the >> error. I have run my script with only 100 instead of 300 files and it >> works. Maybe, you can give it a try. >> > > I did and I could reproduce it. Thanks for the testcase. The fix I > applied looks certainly wierd, but it works for me. Would you mind to > give the next snapshot a try which should be available in a couple of > minutes? > Looks good, the new snapshot works for me. Thanks for the patch :-) What was the reason? Race-condition or something like that? Have a nice day, I will leave the office now... Peter -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/