X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:18:10 +0100 Message-ID: <000501c669f4$a5dc4210$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20060426122030.fb30e530d17747c2b054d625b8945d88.b260285d48.wbe@email.secureserver.net> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 26 April 2006 20:21, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > In this case, I used the full 20060426 snapshot and generated some stuck > processes. The output from 'ps' showed the following: > > PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME COMMAND > 2944 1 1332 29292 ? 78809 13:54:03 /usr/bin/diff > 32184 1 436 2860 ? 78809 14:00:03 /usr/bin/mv > 1560 1 28372 29084 ? 78809 14:06:05 /usr/bin/diff > 9768 1 23420 24436 ? 78809 14:12:04 /usr/bin/diff > > Looking at the Windows Task Manager, those processes were not listed, > but what I suppose to be their shell processes were: > > Image Name PID > bash.exe 2736 > bash.exe 9500 > bash.exe 29048 > bash.exe 30324 > > Note that no bash processes were listed by Cygwin under 'ps'. (Is this > a clue?) Um. I wonder if those processes are or aren't actually there. Isn't there something about bash keeping a pid table of recently-dead kind-of-zombie processes hanging around for a while? Do they show up in "ps"? I have a vague memory but haven't tracked down the thread yet. EB or CV might be able to weigh in on this. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/