X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Danilo Turina Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:16:40 +0200 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <20060424181242 DOT GA5783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <444DA8C5 DOT 6030105 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <444E162C DOT 4080708 AT byu DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) In-Reply-To: <444E162C.4080708@byu.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eric Blake wrote: [...] > Another set of tests is to use the experimental coreutils-5.94-5. > Doing/bin/pwd inside a directory on the strange filesystem stress tests > d_ino (I already know that on ClearCase (MVFS), /bin/pwd fails inside of > versioned directories, such as ccase/foo@@/main/, since ClearCase refuses > to list foo@@ in a readdir of ccase, but that is not cygwin's bug). And [...] I tried /bin/pwd and pwd in a versioned directory (.../business@@/main/...) and it works. Do you mean that it doesn't work with the current snapshot or with the current stable version? Which test exactly fails? Ciao, Danilo -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/