X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Windows 95 support ?
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:32:24 -0500
Message-ID: <000001c669bb$f6f9ba80$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <44505038.2ADAEDB8@dessent.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> From: Brian Dessent
> 
> "Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote:
> 
> > Sorry folks, this is going to probably have to wait until 
> the weekend.  
> > But I am still about 99.44% confident that this is solvable in a 
> > reasonably painless manner.
> 
> Don't you think it's sufficient just to leave it at "thou must install
> IE3+"?
> 
> Brian

It probably is, and that was probably my argument at the time*.  But I also
believe that if a shortcoming such as this can be solved in a simple and
non-intrusive manner, it should be solved.  I think I now have that
solution, so I'm gonna give it a go.

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
* Assuming I actually argued for this; I frankly can't recall if I was
pushing for it or not.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/