Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:48:41 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Windows 95 support ?
Message-ID: <20060425064841.GA25037@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <042520060441 DOT 2520 DOT 444DA85F0009A0AB000009D822007358340A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> <001201c6682e$4edc90e0$020aa8c0 AT DFW5RB41>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001201c6682e$4edc90e0$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:05:51AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> From: Eric Blake 
>> 
>> Gary - you should know better.
>
>No I shouldn't.
>
>>  Top-posting reformatted, to 
>> avoid http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU,
>
>OMG I did top-post!  How the ^*& did that happen?  My sincerest apologies.
>
>> and raw email munged; 
>> you really should http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR.
>> 
>
>I still have yet to hear an offical judgement on whether this applies to
>addresses of the actual lists.

I would prefer that spammers not be fed extra email address nutrition by
embedding the name of the mailing list in messages.  I understand that
the mailing list names may be sitting around in raw format somewhere
where spammers can read them but I have been trying to nuke those locations
whereever I find them.

But, then, on a perhaps more practical note, I don't really see any reason
to include the email address of the mailing list in a message, anyway.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/