X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: cygwin Perl 5x slower than ActiveState? Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:23:00 +0100 Message-ID: <043601c667c3$bcc07150$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20060424171716.GB3890@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 24 April 2006 18:17, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 05:51:41PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 24 April 2006 16:53, Neil E. Deeds wrote: >>> Anyone have an idea as to why Perl runs this code so much slower under >>> Cygwin? >> >> Look up "emulation layer" in any good technical dictionary :) > > But, you forget. Cygwin is emulating linux and linux is faster than > Windows. That feature isn't implemented yet. PTC though! > Dave, you have to think about these things before you just fire off > email! > > The real solution here is to just make sure that all of the time > functions in Cygwin report figures which support the fact that Cygwin is > as fast as Linux. Cygwin already *is* four times faster than windows, but it's implemented in scaled-down step time. One second for cygwin is about equivalent to pi microfortnights on a real linux system. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/