X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:42:31 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Support for older OS's Message-ID: <20060421204231.GB27541@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1145646573 DOT 7213 DOT 259631146 AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1145646573.7213.259631146@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Apr 21 15:09, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna said [in thread entitled "Windows 95 support ?"] > > Just the setup tool has some problem, apparently. Cygwin still runs on 95, which will probably change at one point, since it's getting incredibly awkward to support it. > > I've a related question: how "pleasant" must the user experience be on > older operating systems? Specifically, my [still in ITP state] port of Think along the lines of "it's the OSes fault, not mine", and you'll feel better immediately. > Sleep(40)!! ^^^^^^^^^ > It would also work on older OS's -- but every invocation would incur a > 40 second delay. Which is really *mean*. I'm not sure I'm ready for Wouldn't that be a 40 *milli*second delay? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/