X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:09:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin and Interix interoperability? Message-ID: <20060420180910.GA17432@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4447BE05 DOT 6070103 AT tibco DOT com> <20060420170449 DOT GA24155 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4447CBC1 DOT 3030000 AT tibco DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4447CBC1.3030000@tibco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:58:25PM -0500, mwoehlke wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:59:49AM -0500, mwoehlke wrote: >>>Are there any plans of making Cygwin more compatible with Interix >>> (and especially the (and especially the SFU/SUA NFS clients)? >> >>No, there are no plans. I can't speak for Corinna, but, personally, I >>have no interest in this. That does not preclude someone offering patches >>but I think that's pretty unlikely, too. > >IOW, "DIY"? > >When you say "pretty unlikely", do you mean 'that anyone else would >provide patches', or that such patches would be used? "someone offering patches" == "unlikely event" cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/