X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:58:25 -0500 From: mwoehlke Subject: Re: Cygwin and Interix interoperability? In-reply-to: <20060420170449.GA24155@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <4447CBC1.3030000@tibco.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) References: <4447BE05 DOT 6070103 AT tibco DOT com> <20060420170449 DOT GA24155 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:59:49AM -0500, mwoehlke wrote: >> Are there any plans of making Cygwin more compatible with Interix >> (and especially the (and especially the SFU/SUA NFS clients)? > > No, there are no plans. I can't speak for Corinna, but, personally, I > have no interest in this. That does not preclude someone offering patches > but I think that's pretty unlikely, too. IOW, "DIY"? When you say "pretty unlikely", do you mean 'that anyone else would provide patches', or that such patches would be used? -- Matthew "Ethics? We've heard of it" -- Microsoft -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/