X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <441CD3F8.3010703@tlinx.org> Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 19:46:00 -0800 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: BUG: /sbin in util-linux package References: <20060414183046 DOT fb30e530d17747c2b054d625b8945d88 DOT e0662cc7b8 DOT wbe AT email DOT secureserver DOT net> <4441B33F DOT 1010208 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Igor Peshansky wrote: > I'm sure Yaakov meant that he'll patch it when he next gets around to it, > but in the meantime felt compelled to explain where the current directory > structure came from. > --- Why fix it if it isn't broken? It's that way on linux. All of the mkfs extensions and fsck extensions are in /sbin, along with mkraid, mkswap...etc. Why should it be different on cygwin than on the native platform where the packages come from? I'm in agreement with cfg: "...I don't see any reason not to install things into /sbin if that's where they're going under linux...". -l -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/