X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:01:18 +0200 From: Samuel Thibault To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Thread support in cygwin! Message-ID: <20060413130118.GH4280@implementation.labri.fr> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3894619 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <1144908615 DOT 22144 DOT 6 DOT camel AT localhost> <20060413074220 DOT GA4280 AT implementation DOT labri DOT fr> <1144921003 DOT 22144 DOT 29 DOT camel AT localhost> <20060413121057 DOT GJ9135 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <3899853 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3899853.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Do Nguyen Luong, le Thu 13 Apr 2006 05:57:17 -0700, a écrit : > But I think _POSIX_THREADS definitely is defined. Corinna said the problem > was that _SC_THREAD* values were currently not supported by sysconf(). So > cygwin supports threads and I can ignore sysconf()?? For now, yes. On the long run, you should be able to rely on sysconf(). -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/