X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:37:00 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.15.19 dlopen() dies with no dlerror()
Message-ID: <20060411213700.GA1427@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0604111406110 DOT 24175 AT sue>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0604111406110.24175@sue>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:21:08PM -0700, Michael McKerns wrote:
>Yes, yes...  I've not given you enough information...
>...
>I'm using the standard cygwin syntax for building dll's, but I'm useing
>the raw code that's inside dlltool.
>
>See: http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/dll.html
>http://cygwin.com/faq.html#faq.programming.dll-relocatable

Sorry but I'm not interested in cobbling together a DLL.

Perhaps someone else will want to give this a shot but I suspect that,
as usual, providing a self-contained test case is the best way to go.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/