X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:30:27 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: Cygwin MailList Subject: Re: malloc different for XP and 2000? Message-ID: <20060331093027.GE24357@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin MailList References: <442CF159 DOT 8090508 AT osc-es DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <442CF159.8090508@osc-es.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 31 11:07, Jens Wilken wrote: > Does cygwin use different strategies or limits on Win2K and WinXP? No, but Win2K uses different strategies than XP. Somewhere in MSDN is an article about changes in memory allocation between Windows versions, afair. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/