X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <442CF159.8090508@osc-es.de> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:07:37 +0200 From: Jens Wilken Reply-To: Jens DOT Wilken AT osc-es DOT de User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin MailList Subject: malloc different for XP and 2000? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have an application that needs HUGE amounts of memory. I switched from Cygwin 1.5.10 to 1.5.19 and it runs faster and more stable with virtual memory, great! Still there is one interesting thing: The heap_chunk_in_mb - registry setting seems to have an effect on a Win2000 machine, but no effect on a WinXP Pro machine, where is the difference? To make it more explicit: The registry setting is needed on Win2K, otherwise the application will not be able to allocate the needed memory. The same application will run without any problem on the XP machine without any settings, plain Cygwin installation. Does cygwin use different strategies or limits on Win2K and WinXP? Regards, Jens - -- Dipl. Inform. Jens Wilken Software Developer OSC Embedded Systems AG Industriestr. 11 26121 Oldenburg - Germany Mail: Jens DOT Wilken AT osc-es DOT de Tel.: +49-441-350 42-0 Fax.: +49-441-350 42-364 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFELPFZ/nbz2tIAgUQRAhg/AKCSkJB5t5B8/z8seoF1srNKwvtfGwCfVtmq ndQ30QMbWtvwxUsEBqCg4nk= =F+sb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/