X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: freopen irritates system-call/sh.exe Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:10:29 +0100 Message-ID: <068101c65414$770e68f0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20060330154946.GB20407@calimero.vinschen.de> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 30 March 2006 16:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 30 16:30, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 30 March 2006 16:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> This has nothing to do with the snapshot. It's the latest change to >>> cygrunsrv which re-introduced the short flash. >> >> Perhaps so, but perhaps not - see my last post. I'm fairly sure >> cygrunsrv should not involved in invoking expect.exe when I write "make -k >> check" in a bash shell in a newly-built gcc object dir! I also haven't >> changed my cygrunsrv; I can make the condition appear or disappear by >> using today's dll or the one I built from the 17th. > > I replied only to Eric's observation about cygrunsrv. I didn't talk > about other occurences of console windows. Fair enough; I meant only to suggest that there *may* be an underlying root cause, but of course that should not be read as implying that there could not be two separate causes leading to the same symptom. > As for this spurious console window, it would be very helpful to get > a simple testcase... Yep, I'll see if I can find some combination of fork/exec that does it. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/