X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:40:41 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: very poor cygwin scp performance in some situations Message-ID: <20060328074041.GJ20907@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin List References: <04b601c651b4$a1e9e020$b3db87d4 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04b601c651b4$a1e9e020$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 27 16:39, Steven Hartland wrote: > I've done quite a bit of digging and not found any real answers > on why cygwin's scp performance is so poor. Cygwin is just emulating POSIX by calling Windows functions. It's not an operating system which runs natively on the machine, so what do you expect? If you're unhappy with scp's performance you can try using: - sftp - tar over ssh: tar cf - dir-to-copy | ssh remotemachine 'cd targetdir && tar xf -' - http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/