X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <44215B06.70602@huarp.harvard.edu> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:11:18 -0500 From: Norton Allen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin list Subject: Re: Creating a custom Cygwin package server Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass (ent.arp.harvard.edu: 10.0.0.188 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >> Just be aware that you are entering unsupported territory, >> and get upset from: >> >> http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/upset >> >> "Unsupported" means don't ask this mailing list if you have >> problems. A good alternative might be: > > You can also use "genini" which is meant to be used in place of upset > and is still supported, or rather it still exists in sourceware CVS. > > Brian Thank you both for your responses. I appreciate the meaning of "Unsupported," and I'm sure there must be some history behind this, but do you mind if I ask why? It seems as though being able to build and distribute packages easily is a very useful feature. Was the dropping of support for upset just a push to move to genini (without any documentation), or is there really some other approach that I should be pursuing? -Norton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/