X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Eric Blake Subject: Re: updatedb broken [attn: lapack maintainer] Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <44207423 DOT 6010602 AT elementcxi DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Steve Kelem elementcxi.com> writes: > > I'm having trouble running updatedb. I've tried findutils-4.2.27-1 and > findutils-4.3.0-1. > When I run updatedb manually, I get the message: > updatedb needs to be able to execute /usr/lib/lapack/find, but cannot. > The directory /usr/lib/lapack contains > cygblas.dll cyglapack.dll That's because /etc/profile.d/lapack.sh is polluting the namespace with BINDIR=/usr/lib/lapack, and then updatedb fails to use its default of BINDIR=/usr/bin because BINDIR is already set. I don't know if findutils or lapack is at fault for this conflicting definition of what $BINDIR represents. I can probably work around it in the next findutils release, but wonder if the lapack maintainer should instead be more careful to not pollute the environment during its profile.d script. In the meantime, as a workaround, you can do 'unset $BINDIR' prior to running updatedb. -- Eric Blake volunteer cygwin findutils maintainer -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/