X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <442050CF.209EE687@dessent.net> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:15:27 -0800 From: Brian Dessent MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 4355 pipe handlers open at once - is this to be 'expect'ed? References: <007401c64ce1$ed181990$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Dave Korn wrote: > I thought the value for hProcess looked a little suspiciously high, but on > digging through it with Process Explorer (which appears to be playing nicely > with cygwin programs these days) discovered that it was a real process handle > value, because expect.exe had over four thousand anonymous pipes open: I noticed this a few months ago. At the end of running the full gcc testsuite there were over 60,000 handles in the expect.exe process, the vast majority of which were these anonymous pipes that you show below. I tried to reproduce it with a looping dummy "hello world" test harness but couldn't. I think it's something particular in the (quite customized) gcc 'expect' harness. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/