X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <44189CA0.1D21314@dessent.net> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:00:48 -0800 From: Brian Dessent MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: GCC 4.x+ References: <44185DFD DOT 2040801 AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id k2FN0wYQ030868 Václav Haisman wrote: > is there a plan to move Cygwin over to newer GCC? GCC 3.4.4 is getting > old. I could use the strictness of C++ compiler it brings. There's no reason why you can't build gcc 4.x on your own, it works fine in Cygwin. If you pick a proper --prefix (or use --program-suffix and --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs) it will be completely separate from the installed version of gcc, you can use the two side by side. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/