X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:31:50 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 'Missing isnand' still not fixed in 2006-03-01 snapshot Message-ID: <20060302153150.GA29658@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20060302151417 DOT GF2781 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <037801c63e0d$780f6690$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <037801c63e0d$780f6690$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:24:59PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: >On 02 March 2006 15:14, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:52PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: >>> On 02 March 2006 14:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>> Well, I did this: >>>> $ nm libcygwin.a | grep isnan >>>> 00000000 T ___isnand >>>> 00000000 I __imp____isnand >>>> 00000000 T ___isnanf >>>> 00000000 I __imp____isnanf >>>> 00000000 I __imp___isnan >>>> 00000000 T __isnan >>>> 00000000 I __imp___isnanf >>>> 00000000 T __isnanf >>>> 00000000 I __imp__isnan >>>> 00000000 T _isnan >>>> 00000000 I __imp__isnanf >>>> 00000000 T _isnanf >>>> $ nm libm.a | grep isnan >>>> 00000000 T ___isnand >>>> 00000000 I __imp____isnand >>>> 00000000 T ___isnanf >>>> 00000000 I __imp____isnanf >>>> 00000000 I __imp__isnan >>>> 00000000 T _isnan >>>> 00000000 I __imp__isnanf >>>> 00000000 T _isnanf >>>> >>>> I don't see what would be wrong here. >>> >>> It's not in libc.a, does that make a difference? >> >> It's in libm.a. > >That's orthogonal to the question I asked! Huh? I was providing some information which was missing from any other message I saw in this thread. Since all math functions are supposed to be in libm.a, then it really shouldn't be in libc.a and anything which relied on it being in libc.a would be in error. >BTW, I keep getting this "Error: Version info is older than DLL API!" >message during my builds that I've never seen before. After some >googling, it turns out to be intended to warn that someone has added >new exported APIs but not updated the API_MINOR number. However I see >the API_MINOR has been bumped to 155, so I don't know why I'm seeing >it. Is anyone else getting this? Could it be significant? No. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/