X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:14:17 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 'Missing isnand' still not fixed in 2006-03-01 snapshot Message-ID: <20060302151417.GF2781@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20060302143346 DOT GA22718 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <037301c63e08$8ff49870$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <037301c63e08$8ff49870$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:52PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: >On 02 March 2006 14:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> Well, I did this: >> $ nm libcygwin.a | grep isnan >> 00000000 T ___isnand >> 00000000 I __imp____isnand >> 00000000 T ___isnanf >> 00000000 I __imp____isnanf >> 00000000 I __imp___isnan >> 00000000 T __isnan >> 00000000 I __imp___isnanf >> 00000000 T __isnanf >> 00000000 I __imp__isnan >> 00000000 T _isnan >> 00000000 I __imp__isnanf >> 00000000 T _isnanf >> $ nm libm.a | grep isnan >> 00000000 T ___isnand >> 00000000 I __imp____isnand >> 00000000 T ___isnanf >> 00000000 I __imp____isnanf >> 00000000 I __imp__isnan >> 00000000 T _isnan >> 00000000 I __imp__isnanf >> 00000000 T _isnanf >> >> I don't see what would be wrong here. > > It's not in libc.a, does that make a difference? It's in libm.a. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/