X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: 'Missing isnand' still not fixed in 2006-03-01 snapshot Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:49:52 -0000 Message-ID: <037301c63e08$8ff49870$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20060302143346.GA22718@calimero.vinschen.de> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 02 March 2006 14:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Well, I did this: > > $ nm libcygwin.a | grep isnan > 00000000 T ___isnand > 00000000 I __imp____isnand > 00000000 T ___isnanf > 00000000 I __imp____isnanf > 00000000 I __imp___isnan > 00000000 T __isnan > 00000000 I __imp___isnanf > 00000000 T __isnanf > 00000000 I __imp__isnan > 00000000 T _isnan > 00000000 I __imp__isnanf > 00000000 T _isnanf > $ nm libm.a | grep isnan > 00000000 T ___isnand > 00000000 I __imp____isnand > 00000000 T ___isnanf > 00000000 I __imp____isnanf > 00000000 I __imp__isnan > 00000000 T _isnan > 00000000 I __imp__isnanf > 00000000 T _isnanf > > I don't see what would be wrong here. It's not in libc.a, does that make a difference? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/