X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4403958A.8050007@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:12:58 -0500
From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn AT redhat DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-3.4.4-1: c++: cmath: calling std::isnan results in endless    loop
References: <01d101c63bb9$ef9ead20$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <m34q2kg2k3 DOT fsf AT uniton DOT integrable-solutions DOT net> <44033332 DOT 7020801 AT redhat DOT com> <20060227172100 DOT GJ30238 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <44034757 DOT 8090109 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <44034757.8090109@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
>> Jeff,
>>
>> On Feb 27 12:13, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>>
>>> Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>>
>>>> yes, isnan and friends are supposed to be macros only, not functions.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll start working on a newlib patch for this.
>>
>>
>>
>> while you're at it, please do *not* remove the isnan function
>> implementation.  It's still required to run applications which
>> have been linked against older newlib versions.  Just adding
>> a isnan macro should be sufficient, shouldn't it?
>>
>>
> 
> Yep, way ahead of you :).  I will rename the current implementations to 
> be double-underscored, have the macros call these, and have 
> non-underscored versions that directly call the underscored versions.  I 
> think that should satisfy all concerns.
> 
> -- Jeff J.
> 

I have just checked in a solution.  Builds fine for x86-linux and I 
verified both the new macro versions work and the old function names can 
be called.  Let me know if anything breaks that I didn't anticipate.

-- Jeff J.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/