From: ericblake AT comcast DOT net (Eric Blake)
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: d_ino bug in //
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:58:50 +0000
Message-Id: <022720061758.2378.44033DDA000153AC0000094A22073007930A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> >It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //.
> >Running the program below on snapshot 20060220 produced:
> 
> A (somewhat) simple test case (patent pending) is nice but it really
> should be accompanied with an explanation of the problem.  How about
> describing *in words* what you think is broken?

It looks like Corinna already nailed the issue, but for the
archive's sake, my complaint was that under //, d_ino and
st_ino did not match properly.  With the 20060227 snapshot
(or whenever the next one is), the same test program
should now output:

Searching for //eblake, inode 10556217422951964268
match found at entry 553

-- 
Eric Blake

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/