X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:41:06 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: sed: 4.1.5 breaks libtool generation
Message-ID: <20060224094106.GK4294@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <43FE1CEF DOT 9030905 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <43FECB5A DOT 7060908 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43FECB5A.7060908@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb 24 04:01, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >After a recent update to my Cygwin installation, suddenly
> >configure-generated libtool scripts give me this error when compiling
> >and linking C++ code:
> >
> >libtool: ignoring unknown tag CXX
> >
> >And even worse, it tries to use gcc to link, which of course fails
> >because of undefined symbols provided by libstdc++.
> >
> >Using the /usr/bin/libtool instead works, so this would seem to be
> >caused during the generation of the package libtool.
> >
> >So I guessed that the sed update was the problem, and I was right.
> >Downgrading sed to 4.1.4-1 makes everything work again.
> >
> >I'm attaching my cygcheck output (before I downgraded sed).
> >
> 
> Thanks for the heads up. I'll try to look in to it, but it might be a 
> week or two.

I would appreciate any hint here.  sed 4.1.5-1 has 0 FAILs in the sed
testsuite and the only really interesting Cygwin related difference 
between 4.1.4 and 4.1.5 is that 4.1.4 uses sed's own implementation
of getline(), while 4.1.5 uses the newlib version of getline.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/