X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:12:27 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bindresvport(): can it be exported from cygwin1.dll? Message-ID: <20060223201227.GH4294@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Feb 23 14:29, Andrew Schulman wrote: > I'm trying to build dante, a SOCKS client and server, for Cygwin. Right now > build is failing with > > .libs/Rbindresvport.o: In function `Rbindresvport': > /usr/local/src/dante-1.1.19/lib/Rbindresvport.c:68: undefined reference to > `_bindresvport' > > based on a call to bindresvport(). bindresvport() is normally declared in > netinet/in.h, but in Cygwin it's missing. > > I see that bindresvport.c is part of the cygwin source code. You have apparently better eyes then I have. Where did you see that bindresvport function in Cygwin? If you're talking about the implementation in newlib/libc/sys/linux/... then it's unusable for Cygwin. There's a reason it's in the linux subdirectory... > Would it be > possible to have it exported from cygwin1.dll? No. We need a implementation which uses the limited functionality of WinSock. It's not that hard, but it's definitely not going to be in 1.5.20. http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#SHTDI Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/