X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
Subject:  Re: please test snapshots: we'd like to release cygwin version 1.20
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:53:52 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 15
Message-ID:  <loom.20060223T174641-683@post.gmane.org>
References:  <20060222010657 DOT GA5117 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <loom DOT 20060222T171523-144 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes:

> In an effort to help the testing be easier to perform, I will soon be 
releasing 
> an experimental coreutils-5.94-2 that uses the d_ino member in ls and also 
> in /bin/pwd

Now released, but it pointed out an upstream bug in coreutils - 'ls -i'
currently stubbornly uses [l]stat(), even when d_ino is available.  So ls
is NOT (yet) a good test of the d_ino changes, after all (but it DOES
remain a good test of readdir() refactoring).

-- 
Eric Blake



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/