X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Curious about cygcheck -s' comment on vi
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:09:27 -0000
Message-ID: <00c401c636d7$4770a130$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <43FA8F88.4040607@serv.net>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 21 February 2006 03:57, L Anderson wrote:

> I ran "cygcheck -s" on my system and noticed the comment "Not found:
> vi". A search of the web and Cygwin archives seems to indicate that vi
> is not a Cygwin package and it doesn't show up in Setup.  Therefore, the
> comment seems a bit like saying that oat meal is cholesterol free or
> "Not found: elephants".  :-)
> 
> Just curious.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> L Anderson


  Actually, lack of elephants is an error, not a warning:


---------------------------<snip>---------------------------
dk AT rainbow /repository/gcc-build/binutils> cygcheck -s elephants
Error: could not find elephants

Cygwin Configuration Diagnostics
Current System Time: Tue Feb 21 11:08:09 2006
---------------------------<snip>---------------------------


;)

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/